Though projections are complex and variable, changes in the
climate are sure to impact the biological activity of organisms all throughout
the world. Particularly, climate plays a major role in phenology, which are the
various seasonal cycles of plants and animals within an ecosystem. Dr. Dustan
refers to phenology as the symphony of nature, because blooming, breeding, and
weather all coordinate beautifully to foster optimal conditions and community
dynamics. However, as climate changes, the way that organisms respond varies,
resulting in asynchrony – the ecosystem becomes less coordinated – which has
implications for the community ecology.
For amphibians, phenology is particularly important, as
frogs rely on temperature cues to start breeding so that they can obtain
resources at their optimal yield, as well as coordinate with hydroperiods so to
lay their eggs for development before drying occurs. To test the impact of
temperature changes on frog breeding, Walpole et al. (2012) in “Community-level
response to climate change: Shifts in anuran calling phenology” used
temperature and calling data over 14 years (1995-2008) in Canada for seven
anuran species, predicting that calls world correspond with warming
temperatures. They also used climate change projections to consider these
results for the future of anuran populations.
Calls were monitored at various temperatures throughout
the spring and summer of each year (5, 10 and 15 degrees C) to get a range of
species: Wood
Frog (Lithobates sylvaticus),
Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates
pipiens), Spring Peeper (Pseudacris
crucifer), Gray Tree Frog (Hyla
versicolor), American Toad (Anaxyrus
americanus), Green Frog (Lithobates
clamitans), and the American Bullfrog (Lithobates
catesbeianus). The authors also used climate projections under the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 report’s A2 emission scenario (conservative
estimate) for 2070-2100.
The article found significant temperature increase for April
during the 14 years of temperature monitoring, though not in May, June, or
July. Of the frog call monitoring, the Wood frog, Northern Leopard frog, and
Spring Peeper all called significantly earlier over the course of 14 years, and
Gray tree frog and American toad had a trend of calling earlier, though not
significant. These earlier calling times correlated with temperature for the
Wood frog and American toad. Because the Wood frog, Northern Leopard frog, and
Spring Peeper were all early-breeders, the authors considered these three
species with regard to the IPCC scenario, which predicts a 4.06 degree C
increase in temperature by 2070-2100. In this scenario, the authors calculate
that calling time could be up to 11 days earlier for the Spring Peepers by
these dates, and the Wood frog was predicted to be even earlier. For other
species though, they were not projected to change calling time, which means
that overall there will be a greater length of the anuran breeding
season—starting earlier but ending just as late.
Specifically for the early breeding frogs (Wood, Northern
Leopard, and Spring Peepers), pairing with temperature is necessary because
they tend to utilize temporary ponds more than later breeding frogs. As such,
this explains why they are more sensitive to temperature cues than
later-breeding frogs do not use as temporary of pools. These findings about the
impact of climate on phenology are important, as coordinated community ecology
is critical for a stable environment, and changes to this coordination could be
alter interspecific interactions. Generally, it may alter the dynamic of
resource competition in species are no longer breeding all at the sam times, as
well as predator-prey interactions.
In herpetology class we have discussed a number of ideas
that allow us to understand what prompts frog breeding – and most of them
depend on their environment and its phenology such as hydroperiods,
temperature, and photoperiods. Because temperature is only one of the factors,
a changing climate may do more than this paper proposes to offset frog breeding
times. For example, if frogs are primarily triggered by temperature for
breeding, then the water supply may be off and their ponds may not be full
enough. If frogs respond more to photoperiods, then by the time they breed it
may to too hot and dry for successful rearing. So though we have awareness of
the types of phenological cues that frogs respond to, this paper shows that
only some are correlated with temperature. As such, increased awareness about
changing temperature, as well as determining how frogs respond to varying photo
and hydroperiods is critical to understand the future of anuran populations in
the face of climate change.
Walpole, A.A., Bowmani, J., Tozer, D.C., & Badzinski,
D.S. (2012) Community-level response to climate change: Shifts in anuran
calling phenology. Herpetological Conservation and
Biology 7(2):
249–257.
http://herpconbio.org/Volume_7/Issue_2/Walpole_etal_2012.pdf
1 comment:
Interesting article! Great analysis!
Post a Comment