A study
published in the Journal of Herpetology
last year investigated the relationship between ambush behavior and prey
frequencies in Crotalus horridus. Some prey species targeted by rattlesnakes
are arboreal, while some use fallen logs to move across the forest floor, and
the snakes presumably use different hunting strategies to target them. The results suggest that timber rattlesnakes alter
their hunting strategies in order to capture specific prey.
Rattlesnakes
are known to use several ambush postures when hunting. For this study, the authors defined three
categories: log-oriented, when the snake was coiled and facing a fallen log or
branch; non-log-oriented, when the snake was coiled but not facing any
structure; and vertical-tree, when the snake was coiled at the base of a tree
and facing upward. Snakes were tagged
with radio transmitters and located periodically to record their hunting
behavior. The researchers also collected
fecal samples to determine which species the snakes were eating and used
average weights of the species to estimate the snakes’ biomass intake. Small mammal surveys of the area were done
using drift fences and baited traps.
Vertical-tree orientation was the
most common ambush posture, and gray squirrels made up the largest percentage
of the diet. Because this posture is
only beneficial for catching arboreal animals and not ground-dwelling mammals
such as mice, the authors conclude that the snakes are exhibiting prey choice
and targeting larger mammals. This
indicates that rattlesnakes do not passively sit in frequented areas and strike
at any prey that passes, but instead select ambush locations based on which
prey would be most beneficial to them. However,
the researchers base this conclusion partly on the fact that they did not catch
any squirrels in their mammal survey, so squirrels must be less common than
mice and shrews in the ecosystem. I
found myself questioning the effectiveness of their traps. The authors also suggest that prey choice may
be related to body size, but since their snakes all relatively similar in size,
another study would be required to confirm the relationship. Future studies could also compare northern
populations with southern populations, since southern snakes tend to be
larger. If prey choice is related to
local habitat makeup as well as a snake’s morphology, comparing populations
with reference to habitat type (forest vs. grasses) and prey composition could
be especially enlightening.
Reference:
1 comment:
Good point about potential sampling bias. Nonetheless, I'm impressed that these ground-dwelling snakes are so adept at catching squirrels.
Post a Comment