This made no sense to me. I figured it might make some sense that smaller snakes have slightly more potent venom than their larger counterparts, perhaps to make up for the lack of volume. But smaller snakes producing MORE venom? I decided to investigate this further. Here is what I found...
Volume of Venom
The volume of venom in a snake’s venom gland has been found to increase exponentially with the size of the snake, and can range from 1 – 850ml (or more). (Source: http://ufwildlife.ifas.ufl.edu/venomous_snake_faqs.shtml; http://www.llu.edu/behavioral-health/ebs/hayes/research-a-snake-venom.page)
In addition, larger snakes have larger fangs, which would allow deeper penetration of venom with increased venom flow.
Hayes (1991) Toxicon 29:867-875 |
Potency of Venom
Researchers have shown that younger rattlesnakes often had stronger venom than their older counterparts. In addition, Tun-Pe et al. (1995) showed that younger Russell's viper snakes possessed higher lethal activity and possessed more potent coagulating and defibrinogenating activities than adults. In some species, it has also been shown that younger individuals had more neurotoxins in their venom (Calvete et al., 2010). However, more current research suggests their is a wide range of venom potency among individuals--young or old (http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/gaston/Pests/reptiles/venomousnake.htm)
In summary, research shows that smaller snakes do not produce a greater volume of venom compared to larger snakes. Perhaps the author meant to suggest that smaller, younger snakes may produce more potent venom than their mature counterparts, which has been shown to be possible!
Literature Cited
Calvete JJ, Sanz L, Cid P, De La Torre P, Flores-Diaz M, Dos Santos MC, Borges A, Bremo A, Angulo Y, Lomonte B, Alape-Giron A, GutiĆ©rrez JM. 2010. Snake venomics of the Central American rattlesnake Crotalus simus and the South American Crotalus durissus complex points to neurotoxicity as an adaptive paedomorphic trend along Crotalus dispersal in South America. J Proteome Res 9:528–44.
Tun-Pe, Nu-Nu-Lwin, Aye-Aye-Myint, Kyi-May-Htwe, and Khin-Aung-Cho. 1995. Biochemical and biological properties of the venom from Russell's viper (Daboia russelli siamensis) venoms of varying ages. Toxicon 33:817-821.
2 comments:
Hypothesis 3: Baby copperheads have not yet developed the ability to regulate the amount of venom delivered. This is what I've heard, although I can't find it from a reliable source at the moment (the best I can come up with right now: http://www.reptilechannel.com/media/kid-corner/beyond-beginners/bad-snake-myths-2.aspx.pdf).
Dr. Welch always has an alternative hypothesis...that's why I love her. It would be interesting to see a comparison across as well as within species. Very cool investigating, however!
Post a Comment